🛷 Ultra Sensitive Psa Vs Regular Psa Trafiłeś w sedno. Pomyślałem doskonale, zgadzam się z tobą.

According to PSA's grading standards for a PSA 10, the front of the card must measure between 55/45 to 60/40 and 70/30 on the reverse. BGS presents even less leeway, as a BGS 10 requires 50/50 on the card's face and 60/40 on the back. Before sending a card for grading, collectors can apply the Original GradeMaster Card Centering Tool, enabling collectors to measure the centering of their For the first 4 years that I tested my psa using the ultra sensitive method my psa ranged from .023 to .037. Then at the 4 year point my psa tested at .05 and I did it two more times once using a different lab and they both came back .04. Regular Member. Joined : Mar 2013. Posts : 105. Posted 3/17/2013 3:47 AM (GMT -8) Hi BillyMac, Thanks BCR is biological chemical recurrence…for those who have had surgery one criteria is after PSA has been undetectable , < .1 with a standard PSA test, you have consecutive readings of .2 or higher typically spaced 90 days apart. For those who chose radiation the criteria is different, it is a reading based on the nadir . I'm 62 years old and have a PSA of 3.1 up from 2.1 two years ago. Urologist has suggested getting a biopsy since prostate cancer is in my family (but all much later in age). I suffer from chronic prostatitis and have had a recent flare-up that has lasted 3 months now. PSA was rechecked 5 weeks after the first one and still at 3.1. PSA 5 years later. Bobby999 •. 8 months ago • 44 Replies. i had a prostectomy in 2017 at 61 years old. My diagnosis was pt3a and gleason7 My PSA for the first 4 years showed< sign for ultra sensitive test. Now starting 5 year my PSA is now detectable starting at .014 and now .022. Is this a concern. update i just received my psa results six With the ultra-sensitive test that is 10 times the change of the standard method. Just as some guys have their PSA drawn every month instead of 3 months or 6 months, the stress level over a PSA can be unnecessary. Don't misunderstand. There are times that a PSA every month are necessary and understandable. Take it easy. Life is good. Herein, we report ultra-sensitive sensing of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which is used as a biomarker to detect prostate cancer, using a molybdenum series (MoO 3, MoS 2, and MoSe 2) of two-dimensional nanosheets (2D NSs).Moreover, the design of a 2D NS-based PSA aptamer sensor system was demonstrated based on a fluorescence turn-on mechanism in the presence of a target. Got my first above threshold ultra sensitive PSA test on 9/15/2017 at 0.01 ng/ml post RP f Jronne . 0 Comments - Posted Sep 27 they won't feel a strong need to get regular follow-up monitoring. so had FLA, my PSA was around 10, after FLA PSA was 0.6 and was rising, in 2022 I decided on SBRT/ViewRay at UCLA, and had this in May/22 Subscribe To Cancer: Prostate. Several Forum Brothers, here and elsewhere, have reported a Labcorp PSA result of <0.014. The < sign did not appear to be an error, but it wasn't clear what was going on. It appears this indeed was the lower limit of detection of their ultrasensitive test until just a few years ago. PSA vs hook-it. I'll go with PSA. I've used both systems for years. Hook-it is out of the picture for me. When the loops on the pad wear out, the disk tends to fly off the pad. If you keep your PSA pad clean, re: adhesives, you can get great performance out of a PSA system. WD-40 is a great cleaner to get the glue off. Try this I had Prostate Cancer and had the robotic surgery in 2008. My PSA had been 12.9 and was going up at about 1 PSA per month. The ultra-sensitive PSA was about 0.01 ng after the operation but then within 18 months it went up to 0.19 ng and continued to rise until 2010 at 0.40 ng. So obviously the cancer had returned in less than two years. To form the complex between the liposomes and anti-PSA monoclonal antibody-immobilized wells (used as purchased 12 strips × 8 wells) in the presence of PSA, 100 μL of PSA solution was first Posts : 674. Posted 6/24/2014 6:12 AM (GMT -8) The "regular" test is good for one decimal place or to answer your question the lowest it can read is 0.10. It appears that your numbers so far are carried to two decimal places indicating that you are getting a more sensitive test than the "regular". So it appears that your testing as now being I just received results with PSA at <0.1 (at VA and not ultra sensitive). I'm declaring "UNDETECTABLE ". My PSA in Mar 2022 Was 80+. The diagnosis was aggressive high risk PCa with pelvic LNs. Treated with IMRT, Lupron, 4 months of Zytiga (19 mos to go) . I'm stunned by the decrease. Snuffy Myers always recommended an ultra sensitive PSA test. That's what I've been using for the past 6 years. Snuffy's goal was to reach a "long term durable remission" and using an US PSA test was one way to measure that. I've had an undetectable PSA for over 6 years until recently when it's become detectable again at very low .